What are the two methods of damage assessment used by the ADATs?

The correct answer highlights that the two primary methods of damage assessment utilized by ADATs (Air Defense Artillery Tactical Operations Centers) are automated and manual. Each method has distinct applications and benefits in assessing damage.

Automated methods typically involve using technology and software systems to quickly gather and analyze data, allowing for a more efficient and precise assessment process. This approach minimizes human error and speeds up the decision-making process in response to damage.

Conversely, manual methods rely on personnel to physically assess the damage and report their findings. This hands-on approach can provide nuanced insights and context that automated systems may overlook, particularly in complex situations where visual confirmation is crucial.

By combining both methods, ADATs can leverage the strengths of automation for speed and accuracy while still incorporating the critical observational skills of trained personnel, ensuring comprehensive damage assessments.